Flashoverride posted on June 23, 2009 00:56

Freedom is not the providence of Americans alone. Our founding father wrote, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers form the consent of the governed.

Our founding fathers did not say that theirs was the only form of government, nor the only correct one. That the head of our executive; the titular head of the American State, will stand idly by as the government of another nation, a nation composed of men and women not unlike ourselves, crushes the people in order to maintain power is a disgrace to American values.

There are those among us that believe that the countenance of evil in the furtherance of our own well being is a sustainable principle. Better that others fail in their pursuits of a government which derives its power from the consent of a justly governed, lest we be troubled in their struggle. It flies in the face of our own national birth; of the French, of Lafayette and von Steuben. Our own freedom was not born of America alone; it involved a bitter struggle that pitted empires against one another.

And yet.

Today, we stand on the cusp of a new day - a new beginning with the Persian nation of Iran. A chance to mend that which we have undone. It is true that we once help subjugate the government in a cynical attempt at realpolitik; out of this, the seeds of discord grew the tyranny which the Iranian people now face. And yet, now that we are offered the chance to stand behind the movement which seeks to right this most grievous of wrongs, we again fall prey to such realpolitik. Better that the students be crushed than we are dirtied; now they deal with the inevitable legacy of our failure.

It is a disgrace. This is a sad day in American history, when the nation which has done the most to advance the cause of freedom shall stand aside and legitimize a despicable, tyrannical government. It flies in the face of our very own values. It is unfathomable that a nation such as ours, the greatest force for good in the world, shall now tolerate evils in the name of some temporary and fallible goal. Sacrifice the blood of young Iranian women and men so that we may entertain some fleeting notion of security? It is despicable beyond belief, and an anathema to the foundation of this great nation. We must stand up. We must enjoinder ourselves once again to the notion that all men are created equal, Persian and American alike; and that all men deserve freedom. This is not a call to subjugate the nation of Iran to our will, but to acknowledge that the power of government is derived ultimately from the people which it represents, and when those people are no longer represented, “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”.

That’s what I’d like to see from our fellows in power, but they will not speak the words.


Posted in:   Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Flashoverride posted on May 12, 2009 14:14

This is my response to Lt Daniel Choi's open letter to MSNBC CNN errr, I mean Congress and the President.  While reasonable debate can be had on the merits of DADT, the fact remains that it is the law. It was passed via the standard process by civilian authority, and the US Military is always subordinate to that authority.  If the law really bothered him that much, there were other avenues that would not have forced the military into discharging him.  Unfortunately, our good Lt. went and martyred himself.

Open Letter to President Obama and Every Member of Congress: I have learned many lessons in the ten years since I first raised my right hand at the United States Military Academy at West Point and committed to fighting for my country. The lessons of courage, integrity, honesty and selfless service are some of the most important.  

Apparently the lesson of following orders was not among them, Lt. 

At West Point, I recited the Cadet Prayer every Sunday. It taught us to “choose the harder right over the easier wrong” and to “never be content with a half truth when the whole can be won.” The Cadet Honor Code demanded truthfulness and honesty. It imposed a zero-tolerance policy against deception, or hiding behind comfort.  Following the Honor Code never bowed to comfortable timing or popularity. Honor and integrity are 24-hour values. That is why I refuse to lie about my identity. 

No one asked about your identity.  If they did, they were violating the law.  The law very specifically states that no one can ask you about your orientation, and that you may not talk about it.  The law does not engender you to lie or deceive.  You violated the policy by running your mouth. 

I have personally served for a decade under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: an immoral law and policy that forces American soldiers to deceive and lie about their sexual orientation. Worse, it forces others to tolerate deception and lying. These values are completely opposed to anything I learned at West Point. Deception and lies poison a unit and cripple a fighting force. 

No, it does not.  It states absolutely no such thing.  What it forbids is anyone asking you about your sexual preferences and prohibits you from talking about it.  You must not be good with the reading comprehension thing.  You know what else cripples a fighting force?  Grandstanding Lts, that's what. 

As an infantry officer, an Iraq combat veteran and a West Point graduate with a degree in Arabic, I refuse to lie to my commanders. I refuse to lie to my peers. I refuse to lie to my subordinates. I demand honesty and courage from my soldiers. They should demand the same from me. 

YOUR COMMANDERS NEVER ASKED YOU.  YOUR PEERS NEVER ASKED YOU.  YOUR SUBORDINATES NEVER ASKED YOU.  Jesus, get the hell over it.  You decided to out yourself, in direct contravention of standing lawful authority, and now you will suffer the consequences of your decision. 

I am committed to applying the leadership lessons I learned at West Point. With 60 other LGBT West Point graduates, I helped form our organization, Knights Out, to fight for the repeal of this discriminatory law and educate cadets and soldiers after the repeal occurs. When I receive emails from deployed soldiers and veterans who feel isolated, alone, and even suicidal because the torment of rejection and discrimination, I remember my leadership training: soldiers cannot feel alone, especially in combat. Leaders must reach out. They can never diminish the fighting spirit of a soldier by tolerating discrimination and isolation. Leaders respect the honor of service. Respecting each soldier’s service is my personal promise.  

SOLDIERS DO NOT FIGHT THE LAW.  Let me say this again: SOLDIERS DO NOT FIGHT THE LAW.  “Ours not to question why, ours but to do and die.”  Ring a bell?  If you choose not to follow the lawful authority of the US Army, that's fine, but do us a favor:  Do not lecture us about the merits of an activist military.  It is a horrible idea, and if you had any understanding of history you would know why. 

The Department of the Army sent a letter discharging me on April 23rd. I will not lie to you; the letter is a slap in the face. It is a slap in the face to me. It is a slap in the face to my soldiers, peers and leaders who have demonstrated that an infantry unit can be professional enough to accept diversity, to accept capable leaders, to accept skilled soldiers. 

The Department of the Army is following the law and laid out in 10 USC 654, which you violated, they have to discharge you.  That law was passed by Congress under their authority as laid out in the US Constitution, specifically Article 1, Section 8.  The law was signed by President William J. Clinton. 

My subordinates know I’m gay. They don’t care. They are professional. 

And here's the tell:  They don't care.  They never cared.  Everything would have been fine, except you had to open your trap and decide that hey, you know what?  That Article 1, Section 8 thing doesn't apply to me; I know better than Congress.  I don't have to follow this law because I *feel* that it infringes on my freedoms.  Lt, you must know that there are quite a few freedoms that Soldiers suspend when they sign on the dotted line and put on the uniform.  You just decided not to follow the rules. 

Further, they are respectable infantrymen who work as a team. Many told me that they respect me even more because I trusted them enough to let them know the truth. Trust is the foundation of unit cohesion. After I publicly announced that I am gay, I reported for training and led rifle marksmanship. I ordered hundreds of soldiers to fire live rounds and qualify on their weapons. I qualified on my own weapon. I showered after training and slept in an open bay with 40 other infantrymen. I cannot understand the claim that I “negatively affected good order and discipline in the New York Army National Guard.” I refuse to accept this statement as true. 

You also refused to follow lawful orders. 

As an infantry officer, I am not accustomed to begging. But I beg you today: Do not fire me. Do not fire me because my soldiers are more than a unit or a fighting force – we are a family and we support each other. We should not learn that honesty and courage leads to punishment and insult. Their professionalism should not be rewarded with losing their leader. I understand if you must fire me, but please do not discredit and insult my soldiers for their professionalism. 

You don't get it, do you?  The law is not about you.  The Department of the Army is not about you.  The US Congress, The US Code, and the UCMJ are not about you.  You made this about you, you made this decision.  I hope they taught you about taking responsibility at West Point. 

When I was commissioned I was told that I serve at the pleasure of the President. I hope I have not displeased anyone by my honesty. I love my job. I want to deploy and continue to serve with the unit I respect and admire. I want to continue to serve our country because of everything it stands for. 

You violated orders.  You violated orders.  You grandstanded on national TV and violated orders.  When you accepted your commission, you must remember something about, "I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States".  There's probably also something about, "I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter".  Maybe I missed the part about, "when it suits me".  

Please do not wait to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Please do not fire me. 

Ex Post Facto - even if the law is repealed, you're still fired.


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

So here are my thoughts on the whole Gay marriage kerfluffle.  First off, Perez Hilton is...  well, a fucking twit.  There's really no other way to describe what a self-important, self-aggranding piece of useless nonsense-spewing crap he is.

That being said, one thing that Social cons need to understand is that in a war with the zeitgeist, what is perceived as prudishness usually loses.  That doesn't necessarily mean right or wrong, just it's the wrong hill to hold.  The best answer in my mind is this:  take marriage and go Galt.  Social conservatives need to start campaiging to seperate marriage from the state and put it back in religion, where it belongs.  I think we should all have registered civil unions, if we intend to maintain the traditional construct of "marriage" for the societal benefits.

 The gay "Movement" has long sought the *M* word.  You'll notice they didn't come out full force for expanded civil union rights, which would have brought their unions a matter of social equity.  No, it is my belief they want the Marriage word for the norming effect.  If marriage, which at its root is a religious system, is kept it in the civil system, it's a losing case - seperate but equal and all of that.

That's my $.02, tell me if I'm wrong.


Posted in: Politics , Domestic (US) Politics  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

One of the things I am not a fan of in terms of the modern environmental movement, and especially the legions of "Clean Energy NOW ZOMG!!1!" folks is that they cloak the concrete, fiscal costs of their programs in rhetoric such as, "closing the carbon loophole". Of course this term is ridiculous - there is no such thing as a carbon loophole; the use of the term implies that there is some legal construct concerning the industrial output of carbon and carbon compounds and that somehow "Big Oil" or "Big Coal" are exploiting a bit of legal trickery in order to generate electricity. No such framework exists as of yet; the funny thing is that it's the environmentalists themselves who want to create such a framework and use the force of government to impose it. But you see that sounds scary - and expensive. Besides, it's much easier to demonize big companies.

Another buzzword they like to use is "green-collar jobs". Of course, what they fail to lay out is the fantastical cost of creating these "green-collar jobs", which they expect to be borne by the government, and ultimately you and me. They are seriously expecting US taxpayers to be okay with creating an entire industry that is less efficient than the current model and almost wholly dependent on Federal government spending. Currently, most "green-collar" companies utilize massive tax incentives and subsidies at the state and federal level to appear profitable. In an open market they would fail, because all of that cost would be passed on to the consumer, who simply wouldn't bear it. No one would buy into it. So the greenies have sought to force these technologies on people through the regulatory system and government.

Case in point - on Repower America's Analysis page
http://www.repoweramerica.org/plan/analysis/, where they lay out their projected mix for a "100% Clean electricity", not a single one of their proposals has a dollar value attached. Not one. Here's why: One of their scenarios has a projected target of 23-27% wind power. Let's do some analysis on the costs of making that happen.

Per the site http://www.windustry.com/how-much-do-wind-turbines-cost, the costs for a commercial scale wind turbine in 2007 ranged from $1.2m to $2.6m per MW of nameplate capacity installed.  Most of the commercial-scale turbines installed today are 2 MW in size and cost roughly $3.5m installed.  Wind turbines have significant economies of scale. Smaller farm or residential scale turbines cost less overall, but are more expensive per kilowatt of energy producing capacity.  Wind turbines under 100 kilowatts cost roughly $3,000 to$5,000 per kilowatt of capacity.  That means a 10 kilowatt machine (the size needed to power an average home) might cost $35,000-$50,000.

Per Repower America's plan
http://www.repoweramerica.org/plan/analysis/,  "continuing the double digit levels of growth seen over the past several years for this proven technology, scale up wind to 315-400 GW or between 23%-27% of the projected demand (and 33%-37% of the annual generation).  This amount of wind would require 125,000-200,000 2-2.5 MW wind turbines distributed around the country in locations on-shore and off-shore."

By my math, 315GW /.002GW = 157,500 2MW Wind turbines.  157,500 * $3.5m per installed wind turbine = $551,250,000,000.00.  At the upper end of the scale, 400GW / .0025GW = 160,000 2.5MW Wind turbines = $560,000,000,000.00, again using the $3.5m figure.  Using $1.2m per MW nameplate, a 2MW turbine costs $2.4m, and a 2.5MW turbine costs $3m.  Using the figure of $2.6m per MW nameplate, a 2MW turbine costs $5.2m and a 2.5MW turbine runs a cool $6.5m.  To sum up, the cheapest possible proposal is 315GW using 2.5MW turbines at $3m each, totalling $378,000,000,000.  The most expensive is 400GW using 2MW turbines at $5.2m, totalling a whopping $1,040,000,000,000.  That's a trillion dollars.  In other words, roughly one half to one third of the US Government's annual budget or roughly twice the annual DoD budget.

All of this to build one-quarter of projected eletrical generation capability.

All of this seems really odd to me because we already had a Manhattan Project that already solved this problem, but it is many of these same NIMBYs who tried their damndest to kill nuclear energy who want to shift our grid to "clean energy" from sources they control. I'll go ahead and remind you that nuclear power has a lower carbon footprint than wind, solar, biofuels, or any other "clean" technology out there, with the exception of hydroelectric (which is no longer considered a "clean" source of electricity out here in WA).

*edited for formatting*


Posted in: Politics , Domestic (US) Politics  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Flashoverride posted on May 2, 2009 20:07

So for the next couple of days I'll be doing a sort of data dump on position pieces, if you will.  I lurk on a lot of sites but don't get into it, usually because my work schedule doesn't allow real-time back and forthery.


Posted in: General , Politics  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Flashoverride posted on May 2, 2009 19:20
So this is my initial post.  This blog is basically politics, then my favorite things:  Guns, computers, guns, cars, guns, and things that go boom.  Oh, and I swear a lot.  And I mean A LOT.

Posted in: General  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Page List

    Calendar

    «  February 2010  »
    MoTuWeThFrSaSu
    25262728293031
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    1234567
    View posts in large calendar

    Tag Cloud

    None

      Blog Roll

        OPMLDownload OPML file

        Month List

        Recent Posts

        Recent Comments

        Disclaimer
        The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

        © Copyright 2010 Flashoverride